Records stay in this browser and origin. Export to transfer history. Use fictional codes and synthetic material; do not enter identities or confidential evidence.
Your reasoning, kept in view
Give a decision a traceable foundation.
Define the approval and its source. Capture a later version. Follow the exact assumption it challenges, then decide what changes.
01 / Establish the original basis
What are you approving, and why?
Create an original synthetic approval. The baseline requests documents:read only; declared grants are entered independently. Nothing is authenticated or observed at runtime.
Original basis → current scope
What changed
Why it matters
What remains unknown
Who is responsible
Recorded outcome
Inspect the immutable original approval
02 / Compare the source
See what changed.
Original baseline
Later version
Record one later synthetic capture.
A new capture is immutable. It does not open a review or change the decision automatically.
03 / Follow the dependency
Why this decision is affected.
Inspect exact dependency and review references
04 / Human reassessment
You record what follows.
05 / Preserve the reasoning
Every basis. Every outcome.
Import history Inspect, then restore
Choose a Decision Continuity JSON export, maximum 1 MiB. Nothing is uploaded. Inspection writes nothing; confirmation restores only a missing record and opens its workspace. Different existing history cannot be overwritten.
Review before restoring
Consistency checks do not prove authenticity. Synthetic reviewer codes are not authenticated; browser storage is editable.
Synthetic technical demonstration. No live source checks, real access revocation, authentication, remote sharing or operational assurance.