Loading Decision Continuity…

Guided example Start here

Follow the change.
Keep the reasoning.

Does our earlier decision still hold—and exactly what changed? Work through one fictional assistant approval, from a changed request to a recorded human outcome.

One decisionExplicit dependencyPreserved history
Loading local synthetic session

A new session keeps earlier history. A session link selects a record stored in this browser; it does not share the record remotely.

Import history Restore a saved synthetic session

Choose an exported JSON file, inspect its summary, then confirm. Maximum 1 MiB. Files stay in this browser; nothing is uploaded. Existing history cannot be overwritten. A session link alone does not transfer data.

Your next step

Start with the source comparison.

Load the unchanged control first, then compare the new write-access request.

Compare evidence

Decision context · DEC-001

The approval that set the boundary.

Loading decision

The original approval was limited to read-only summarization. Keep its basis in view as the review develops.

The current decision will appear here.

Linked assumption · ASM-001

The assistant requests only read access within its approved scope.

Loading assumption
Inspect the original decision and rationale
Compare the evidence

01 / Compare

See the change before judging it.

Compare the selected manifest against the original approval basis. The unchanged control shows why a new version alone should not trigger review.

Synthetic permission manifest

Start with the unchanged control, then load the write-access request.

How to read requested, granted, and observed access
Requested
What the manifest asks to access.
Declared granted
What this synthetic source says was granted; no live system has been queried.
Observed
Activity supported by runtime evidence. This case has no observed activity; that does not prove activity never occurred.
Approval basis

Original evidence

The preserved baseline will appear here.
Selected comparison

Selected evidence

Select an evidence version to begin.
Evidence comparison

The relevant difference

Explicit source fields
A comparison will appear after selecting evidence.
Inspect the evidence relationship

02 / Trace

Follow the reasoning behind the decision.

Expand each linked record to see what the source supports, which assumption it affects, and whether the original decision needs attention.

Explicit evidence relationships
Select evidence to inspect the affected relationship.

Change detection identifies a reason to review. The reviewer decides the outcome.

See review status

03 / Review

The evidence informs. You decide.

Assess the changed request, explain what the evidence supports, and record the scope that should apply next.

Human accountability
Responsible reviewer

Morgan Lee

Synthetic reviewer · no real authentication

Awaiting evidence

Choose evidence before opening a review. The original decision stays preserved.

Choose evidence

04 / Preserve

Keep the full chain of reasoning.

Inspect the original decision, selected evidence, and human outcomes. Export this session as a separate JSON record.

The original decision and subsequent review history will appear here.